Hozier’s “Take me to Church”: my analysis

“Take Me to Church” by Hozier, an infectious gospel infused blues track, has definitely made waves in the current music scene. It was nominated for Song of the Year at the 2015 Grammy Awards. Additionally it was nominated for 5 awards at the 2015 Billboard music awards: Top New Artist; Top Rock Artist/ Song/ Album, Top Streaming Song (Audio). The title is a sentiment that we as believers can affirm. However, this is not Hozier’s intention at all. As one reads through the lyrics and perhaps watches the video there is another message entirely. The underlying message seems to be contra-church.

My lover’s got humour
She’s the giggle at a funeral Knows everybody’s disapproval

The “lover” is
disrespectful and light-hearted, she simply doesn’t care what anyone thinks.

I should’ve worshipped her sooner
If the Heavens ever did speak
She is the last true mouthpiece
Reversal of the
paradigm, the lover is the object of worship. She is the metatron, the voice of
“god;” if there is even such a thing as god.

Every Sunday’s getting more bleak
A fresh poison each week ‘We were born sick,’ you heard them say it

The church tells us we
are broken and sick. We go every week and it just gets worse. (Objective
morality)

The only heaven I’ll be sent to

My church offers no absolutes
She tells me ‘worship in the bedroom’

Is when I’m alone with you
I was born sick, but I love it Command me to be well
Amen. Amen. Amen
The “lover” is the
acceptable church. She offers no judgment, just sexual pleasure. I was made for
hell, I am broken and I don’t care, the “lover” is the only heaven I can depend
on.  (Subjective morality)

Take me to church
I’ll worship like a dog at the shrine of your lies I’ll tell you my sins and you can sharpen your knife
Offer me that deathless death Good God, let me give you my life

At first glance, this
chorus appears to be saying that lyricist wants to be saved. On further
investigation, he is mocking the church. The lover makes him free, you offer
only bondage and judgment.

If I’m a pagan of the good times
My lover’s the sunlight
To keep the Goddess on my side She demands a sacrifice
To drain the whole sea Get something shiny
Something meaty for the main course That’s a fine looking high horse
What you got in the stable?We’ve a lot of starving faithful
That looks tasty That looks plenty
This is hungry work
The second verse starts
out as a sort of invocation, a prayer to the lover. I will give her anything; do anything she asks of me so that she, my “Goddess,” will sustain me.

The church, high-handedly takes everything and gives nothing but judgment in return. The masses are left hungry in the mud by it, when there is plenty, those below are expected to hold it up and support it on broken backs and starving stomachs.

No masters or kings when the ritual begins
There is no sweeter innocence than our gentle sin In the madness and soil of that sad earthly scene
Only then I am human Only then I am clean
Amen. Amen. Amen
The last verse defines
the sex act, the worship of his lover’s “church.” There is no one
metaphorically over the other. The “sin” is its own absolution. It is only then
that he/they are complete, it is only then that they are not longer judged.  

 While this song is clever, it is also disturbing. It quite popular and further evidence that we must be vigilant and watchful over our children’s and our own input.

Until next time, Fight the Good Fight…Fairly
T.

 

Chameleon Evangelism

For though I am free from ALL, I have made myself a servant to ALL, that I might win more of them. To the Jews I became as a Jew, in order to win Jews. To those under the law I became as one under the law (though not being myself under the law) that I might win those under the law. To those outside the law I became as one outside the law (not being outside the law of God but under the law of Christ) that I might win those outside the law. To the weak I became weak, that I might win the weak. I have become ALL things to ALL people, that by ALL means I might save some. I do it ALL for the sake of the gospel, that I may share with them in its blessings  – 1 Corinthians 9:19-23 (emphasis my own)

In 1 Cor. 9, Paul tells the church that he is bound only to God, that Paul is releasing his rights. He then goes on to tell the church that while he is free he subjects himself to the requirements of sharing the Gospel. It is in the sharing of the Gospel that Paul find reward, not in financial security or his own desires. Although Paul does tell the church in v. 14 that is only right that one should be supported financially by the proclamation of the Gospel, but that is for another time I think.

Paul’s desire to share the Gospel is universal. Repeatedly Paul uses the term “all.” He is not beholden to anyone save God, but he voluntarily subjects himself to the strictures of communities for the sake of the Gospel. He becomes a part of the community to which he is speaking. He gets inside a people group and understands  them and is then understood in turn.

What does this mean for us? I was once taught a maxim, “all means all, that is all; all means.” Paul tells us to “be all to all, so some will believe.” Paul’s statement about the Law is telling, his understanding was binary. You were either a person under the Law (Jew), or a person not under the Law (Gentile). It is an enormous leap of love and commitment to make the statement in 1 Cor. 9 for Paul, and honestly a great exemplar for us. Christ told us that Love is the greatest commandment, and it seems we miss this mark often.

It is easy to say we love another, that we are unconditionally committed to them, it it quite difficult to actually demonstrate that love without condition. We, the Church, looks as sinners with disdain. They are the unforgiven, and we pay them at best lip service. Jesus would have been there with them, showing them His love. Yet, we don’t do this. Instead we tell each other what good believers we are, we turn Church into a social club that is locked from the inside.

I propose that to follow Paul and Jesus we need to heal from the inside out and open the doors of the Church both physically and personally to the lost. We need to welcome the lost into our midst, but more importantly we need to go into theirs and be a light.

Be All, to All, so that Some will come to believe.

Until next time…Fight the Good Fight…Fairly

T.

 

Universal Mafia

I heard a question the other day posed to a Catholic, “why do you pray to the saints and not just Jesus or God?” The Catholic answered, God/Jesus are so in demand and busy; so we pray to the saints because we know a guy that knows the Guy. The Guy (Jesus/God) is very busy, and we don’t wish to waste His time with trivialities.

Are the saints nothing more than a go-between, for humanity and the Godhead? Should we see a heavenly kingpin in the person  of Jesus? Do we need to go to the saints to get to the Guy?

If any of the above is true, then Jesus was a liar, and His sacrifice is greatly belittled.

Jesus came and lived as a man among humanity. He “poured out” His God-ness for a season, so that He could be like us in every way. He tells us that “you know me, so you know the Father also.” That sounds pretty relational and open to me. Jesus is called our “advocate” to the Father. Again, it really doesn’t sound like we need a go-between to reach the Godhead. The Holy Spirit is our Paraclete, literally “called alongside one”. This seems to imply that the Holy Spirit is never to busy or overtaxed to be there to help. So, both Jesus and the Holy Spirit seem to already make the Godhead all-access. 

The term “mafia” has specific implications. I use the term in this sense, “a closed group of people in a particular field, having a controlling influence.” Another way to see this is a hierarchy of organization, which is certainly the case in heaven and all of God’s creation. In the case of the Roman Catholic Church one might point to the College of Cardinals and the Vatican for examples. They are certainly a closed group in a particular field. The Holy See, the Pope, is selected from the College of Cardinals, He is “made” by them as God’s presence and voice on earth. Most of the Popes are canonized, made into saints, and continue to do their work as a go-between for earth with heaven. Throughout all of the clergy of the RCC the idea of go-between is encouraged. 

One must go to Mass to commune with God, it is not possible to know God outside of the consecrated priest. It is through the service of the Eucharist in the RCC that one is saved. The elements of Communion served by a consecrated priest brings redemption. Last Rites are required as a last entreaty to heaven for the soul of the dying. Without these things the individual could be lost, or at the very least know additional suffering in the afterlife.

Do we need a go-between? Perhaps, but not because we need a “guy that know the Guy.” Rather, it seems we need someone to vouchsafe our place in the hierarchy of heaven. Through Jesus, and Him alone, are we granted this privilege. Then each of us becomes the “guy that knows the Guy,” and we need no other. Jesus conquered death and sin for us. A personal relationship with Him is literally all that matters. Do you have to know Him, or believe that He saved you? No, you have a choice. Jesus made you a deal that you can refuse, but you shouldn’t. The Heavenly Mafia want you, but it is up to you to believe it and become a re-“made” man.

Until next time, Fight the Good Fight….Fairly

T.

 

Have you Pi, it’s irrational.

Today, 3.14, is Pi Day. Pi is a mathmatical constant and an irrational number. In the first case it is necessary for geometry and trigonometry and much of our understanding of the physical world would have not been possible without it. In the later it is difficult to express exactly as a common fraction and it is a transcendental number, meaning it is a non-algeabraic.

  Jesus’ sacrifice for humanity is much like Pi. Jesus’ sacrifice prima fascia seems irrational, yet it was/is necessary for the possibility of humanity’s justification. Likewise, Jesus is transcendent in His divinity. For a time he “poured out” out that divinity so that we might have an acceptable “constant” as a sacrifice. 

 

What Do You Look Like?

Untitled Blog Post Name

When people see you, what do they see? Life is about image and perception. Gene Simmons of the band KISS made this statement, “ Sweden has a king…do you know what he looks like? No? But all of Sweden knows what KISS looks like. 

The members of KISS developed 4 larger than life personas, and figuratively took over the world. They proclaimed themselves as the “World’s Biggest Rock Band” and then they became  the embodiment of that idea. Was it hard? Absolutely! Was it worth it? No doubt.

Image is important. Who do people see when they look at you? Do they see a broken, helpless person; or do they see a son or daughter of the King? In medieval times warriors were associated with personal or household armorial pictograms. The idea of uniforms as identification is still  strong in the militaries of the world today. One can fairly easily identify country of origin and branch just by the clothes of the soldier.

So, arguably we are who people perceive us to be. Often outside perception is what makes or breaks us as individuals. First, in Christ, we are never individuals, we are always part of a unit. When we identify with Christ, our reflection and actions are judged as His. Just like when a Marine does wrong the Corps is seen in that light as well and its reputation is injured by the association.

Our actions matter. Christ’s reputations matters. We might not know what the king of Sweden looks like, but the World should know what Christ,the King of Glory, looks like. Jesus isn’t  the artist representation European representation. Rather, the world should see Christ proclaimed and embodied in you and me. We may be the only representative of Christ that a person sees. 

Do they see just you in a shirt with Christ’s emblem on it , or do they see Christ? 

Until next time; 

Fight the Good Fight….Fairly

T.

 

Book Review: Legend of the Monk and the Merchant – Twelve Keys to Successful Living

I love this book! The twelve concepts in this short book are paradigm shifting. Most of them are common sense, but unfortunately such sense is no longer all that common. 

From the first words of the Foreword by David Ramsey, to the last words of the final of Nine chapters, I was completely hooked. There are far more than the indicated 12 concepts at play here. Of those the most important is to share the knowledge of this book with others. 

I have already done so and frankly I intend to continue to do so. This book should be required reading for every person. 

Booklook.com provided a complimentary review copy of this book.

 

Book Review: The War on Christmas – Battles of Faith, Tradition, and Religious Expression. Edited by Bodie Hodge

I did not really like this book. In fairness though, I don’t think it was written for the serious scholar.

This book is intended to drive home one single point; “No Christ, no Christmas.” In so doing this book is extremely repetitive, to the point of making it difficult to read through the 144 pages of text and illustrations.

A variety of issues contained within the Christmas stable are addressed: Christmas star, Wise Men, and Christmas tree. The thread of the argument is that these things are not essential to Christ, but are part of the Christmas celebration. I was interested to see the unusual opinion that the Magi were most likely not believers, but rather astrologers who had seen signs and portents in the sky.

The one serious bone I have to pick is the explanation of pagan religion’s development in Chapter 4. While the explanation is somewhat possible, it seems to me to be largely untenable. It is certainly true that some pagan religion is based on ancestor worship, but there is little evidence to indicate that such practice is the root of all pagan religion and practice. Helen of Troy is connected to Elishah, and regional syntax is given as the reason. The idea that all the personages of pagan religion are descended from the children and grandchildren of Noah is a little far-fetched.

In conclusion, there is certainly a war of thought in play today. Christmas is part of that war. A good deal of this book seems to be well researched and its message is certainly laudable. However, I would be careful whom one recommends this book to. It functions as a decent overview of the salient issues. It does get preachy at times, and sometimes the claims are simply the stuff of fantasy. Even for that the core message is the same; No Christ, No Christmas.

Disclaimer: This review was written as a member of the War on Christmas launch team.

 

Chart: Jesus in other religions

I found this chart at http://www.religionfacts.com/jesus/religious_views.htm.

I thought I would share it here to start out a proposed series on Jesus’ identity in other world religions. Sometimes the best approach is to know what the people in our lives think about the person, Jesus, we hold most dear. In this way we can better show them the truth of Christ, and help them through the falsehood they believe as gospel.

	God or Man?	Who Jesus Was	Jesus’ Purpose	Resurrection Happened?
Traditional (Nicene) Christianity	Both: “fully God and fully man.”	Second person of the Trinity, incarnation of God, Son of God, Savior.	Die for the sins of humanity.	Yes
Arianism	A created divine being.	A divine being, but created by God and inferior to Father. Son of God. Savior.	To save humanity from sin.	Yes
Baha’i Faith	Man	A “manifestation of God” and prophet. Since superseded by Muhammad and Baha’u’llah.	To reveal God’s will as part of progressive revelation to humanity.	Only spiritually.
Buddhism	Man	Wise and enlightened man who taught similar things to the Buddha.	To teach humanity wisdom and the way to enlightenment.	Not addressed
Christian Science	Man	Wise man especially attuned to the divine Christ.	To teach humanity, heal, and overcome death.	Yes
Christadelphians	Man (or half-man, half-God).	Son of God but human, because mother was human Mary. Lived a sinless life and died sacrificial death.	To show God’s love for humanity and redeem humanity from sin.	Yes
Gnosticism	God	Divine being sent from the supreme God.	To rescue humanity from the material world by revealing true knowledge.	Most Gnostics reject that Christ died at all. The human Jesus was ordinary and did not resurrect.
Hinduism	Views vary	Incarnation of God akin to Krishna, or wise man.	Not addressed	Not addressed
Islam	Man	True prophet sent by God, but superseded by Muhammad.	To reveal God’s will in a progressive revelation that ended with Muhammad.	No
Jehovah’s Witnesses	An archangel	Son of God, Word of God, God’s first creation, Archangel Michael.	Teach about God, provide a model for right living, die sacrificially for human sin.	Yes
Mormonism (LDS)	Man	Son of God, Savior, originally one of the spirit beings that all humans used to be. Has a physical body.	To teach about God, provide a model for living, die sacrificially for sin.	Yes
Theosophy	Man	Great teacher.		No
Unitarian Universalism	Man	Great teacher, faith-healer, “incarnation of God’s love.”	To demonstrate God’s love for humanity and teach about justice and compassion.	No official teaching; most do not believe physical resurrection.

 

Adoption: Are we a mirror?

The idea of adoption has a sort of stigma. One feels less for being adopted. It seems that a person must be unwanted, and discarded to be eligible for adoption. This is not necessarily a bad thing. If one is unwanted and discarded, then it is quite possible that rebirth and reshaping is possible. This is especially true of the Christian life.

    I was reminded of this by a passage in Magician’s End by Raymond E. Feist. A child born from a soldier taking advantage of a character’s soon to be wife is adopted by him. This child goes onto be characterized as resembling him, taking on his mannerisms and expressions; to the point that it was often almost impossible to remember that they are not biological sire and son. Rather, this child has become a scion, an implant, a figure that is spliced into the family. So close as to be mistaken for the biological child of this man.

    We, as followers of Christ, are likewise scion. We are grafted into the tree of life, and should appear to belong. It goes far beyond appearance into every aspect of being. We need to become like Him; Jesus was and is the exemplar for our daily behavior. As disciples we need to strive to have behavior that is indistinguishable from His.

    As I trained in martial arts, I often used a mirror to see if I was doing the motions correctly. Also, I often mirrored the motions of those more advanced than me. Both these practices are important. In the Christian life it often comes down to the failure of the disciple maker and often that of the disciple as well in mimic the demonstrated behavior. It is very easy to get lost in the shuffle of belonging without belief. It is the belief that makes one want to mirror the action of Jesus and the Father.

    Just like the warriors, we need to learn how to mirror. We need to become so close to the action of Jesus that we cannot be told apart from Him. We need to resemble Him. We need to take on the mannerism, expressions, and habits he set forth or would approve of. In so doing we will become so like him that adoption is a non-issue; that belonging and belief are intertwined. Only then will we as warriors be in tune enough to lock shields and support each other in a phalanx of belief. It is this behavior and lifestyle that allows for battlefield brothers and sisters to be a family of protection.

Until next time…

Fight the good fight, fairly…T.

    

 

What has love got to do with it?

John 13:31-35:

31 When therefore he had gone out, Jesus said, “Now is the Son of Man glorified, and God is glorified in Him; 32 if God is glorified in Him, God will also glorify Him in Himself, and will glorify Him immediately. 33 “Little children, I am with you a little while longer. You shall seek Me; and as I said to the Jews, I now say to you also, ‘Where I am going, you cannot come.’ 34 “A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another, even as I have loved you, that you also love one another. 35 “By this all men will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another.” NASB

    

I would like to go a bit further. Unfortunately, at least linguistically, English is semantically complex as most languages go. That is to say that it is often difficult to articulate precisely what one intends to express with it. The term “love” offers some illustration in this regard. In this case the root in Greek is agapao, what we refer to as agape or God’s love. Often this “love” has as its intent moral obligation. Jesus calls his disciples “little children,” it seems that He is expressing an acceptance of them in adoption; they are literally members of the family of God.

Vs. 34 then lays out the new commandment, shortly put: Love others as I would, and care for one another as I have. It is by these actions that everyone will know that you belong to me. This is not longer Jesus the teacher, but Jesus the King telling his “court” how they will be identified. Jesus makes this statement at this time and not earlier for at least two essential reasons. First, he doesn’t make this statement until after Judas Iscariot is gone. Judas could not hear these words for at least two reasons that I can think of immediately. Jesus does not want to deepen Judas’ moral quandary and possibly not be crucified. Also, while Judas was an intimate, this overt language could tip off the Jewish and Roman authorities that killing Jesus will not solve their problem. I am certain that Judas and the authorities know there will be some fall out, but the surest way to silence a movement is to remove the head. Secondly, when the statement is made it made to a room full of disciples who know that Jesus is not just another great teacher. Most if not all have a deep surety that he is the Messiah and what they have seen tells them that he is also most likely God. If Jesus had not lived out the statement before them, it would have less force.

What the disciples had seen at this point was the King of all Heaven, the greatest monarch that could possibly be conceived, love without reservation. They had seen the destruction of his righteous indignation and his deep and tender caring. They had seen God walk amongst the sick, the wounded, and the very refuse of humanity. They had seen Jesus break the barriers of hallakah, the 614 Jewish oral laws that protected one from violating Torah. They had seen God model right moral obligation for them.

What are we to make of this? It is simple. God is our King, as such we must serve Him, and we are physically and morally obligated to do so. In so serving we are identified as one of His. This tabard offers the protection of heaven but also invites with vigor the rejection of those in opposition to our King. What Jesus told the disciples and through extension past, present and future believers is that simply that we most love without reservation. We must do so recklessly with little regard to the earthly consequences; even if it means our life. It is this love that marks us. It is for this reason that we go out and tell people about Jesus. It is for this reason that people lose their lives for the “great work” of the Gospel.

Love has everything to do with it. We love the unlovable, and touch the untouchables. We go where the hurting is, and we raise those who have fallen. We are to clothe the naked, feed the hungry, and give drink to the thirsty. We, the followers of Christ, may be the only Christ that some will ever know. It is what Jesus would do. The “Christian” life is not easy, and often it is downright uncomfortable, but the rewards both earth and heaven bound, are more than worth the pain.

 

Until next time, Fight the good fight, fairly.

Ty